Home
HOME TELUGU DIGGS GALLERY WALLPAPERS VIDEOS MY SPACE FORUMS REVIEWS RECIPES KIDS New GAMES CLASSIFIEDS YELLOW PAGES ARTICLES
   Register     Login  
Ads
Menu
Movies
Women


<< Newer Post Comments Older >>



Bollywood icon Amitabh Bachchan and son Abhishek have been asked by a tax tribunal to pay tax on the 'Versa' car given to them by carmaker Maruti Udyog Ltd as part of their professional fees for endorsing the brand.

The case dates back to 2000, when the father and son duo entered into an agreement with the auto major for its multi-utility vehicle 'Versa'. According to the agreement, both the actors were to get Rs 4.02 crores and a Versa as professional fees. The car was delivered in 2001.

However, the Bachchans did not mention the receipt of the car to tax authorities in the income tax returns filed for the financial year 2001-02.

Later, during audit, tax officials found that the car was not shown as part of their income in 2002-03 also.

The department valued the car at Rs 6.34 lakhs on the basis of its insurance certificates and directed them to pay tax by adding it as part of their professional income.

The IT department could not, however, establish the time when the car had been actually received, so it added its value to the income of the year 2001-02.

Bachchan had challenged the contention in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, saying that a car is said to be received only on the date of registration and if the registration is not done the person is not deemed to be the owner.

However, the tribunal rejected the appeal and held the department was right in its calculation as the actor himself had not provided information about the delivery of the car.

"The Assessing Officer is perfectly justified in bringing the same (Versa) to tax as his professional income in the year in question as the assessee (Amitabh Bachchan) has not acknowledged the receipt towards rendering services as per the agreement," the tribunal said.

"In the absence of contrary evidence brought on record by the assessee, the Department is justified in bringing the same as part of professional income of the assessee in the year in question," the tribunal observed.

source:Hindu




Related Stories:

  • Tribunal directs Bachchan duo to cough up tax on Maruti Versa
  • Big blow to Eenadu chief Ramoji Rao
  • No mention of Tribunal verdict in Eenadu
  • Amitabh Bachchan considers Bollywood more creative than Hollywood
  • Amitabh Bachchan defends writing blog in Hindi
  • Farhan Akhtar signed as the brand ambassador for Maruti's A-Star
  • Babu defends Ramoji Rao!
  • Ramoji grilled by IT officials
  • Ramoji Rao evades sales tax
  • Why do Roshans avoid paying Protection Money?
  • Congressmen dare Commnunists
  • Bollywood's Bachchan gets honorary degree
  • Vishnu and Genelia in Dhee
  • Amitabh Bachchan - the lord of endorsements
  • DHAMAAL will not be delayed due to Dutt
  • Rajni film, Sivaji fetched for Rs 3.1 cr in Kerala
  • Big B shaken - takes out gun!
  • 70 crore windfall for Vundavalli?
  • Jiah Khan says age no bar in romancing Amitabh Bachchan
  • Bachchan’s big-hearted gesture
  • Latest News
  • Ghajini creates new record
  • Vidya makes work a family affair
  • Count Ameesha Patel in...
  • Rab Ne will not release in Pakistan
  • Priyanka DARES TO BARE for BF
  • King Khan lashes out at Islamic fundamentalism
  • 'After Kama Sutra, it is Bollywood and Shah Rukh in Poland'
  • Amitabh Bachchan Apprehended For Carrying Gun On Flight
  • Film "Sat Sri Akal" must watches for all the students - Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Mana
  • Bollywood hero Khan to tackle Islam, terrorism in new movie
  • Bollywood’s new poster boys
  • Shah Rukh Khan Recieves Datukship
  • Bollywood goes kung fu
  • With Maharathi, Paresh Rawal turns producer
  • Saif, Kareena vent anger against politicians
  • Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend



    Sponsored Links





    Copyright Content © 2004 by Bharat Waves  |   |